CISO and Security Decision-Maker Research
Research with qualified security and technology leaders, using screening based on role, company profile, responsibilities and decision involvement.
Industry expertise
Independent cybersecurity research for strategy, marketing and communications.
Selected Cybersecurity Clients
What CITE provides
CITE Research designs and conducts quantitative and qualitative cybersecurity studies around the audience, market question and intended use.
We help define the research strategy, qualify the right participants, develop the questionnaire or discussion guide, manage fieldwork and quality review, analyze the findings and deliver clear evidence for business and communications programs.
At a Glance
Audiences
CISOs, CIOs, security leaders, practitioners, IT decision-makers, employees and consumers
Methods
Surveys, executive interviews, qualitative and mixed-method research
Markets
U.S. and international studies
Timing
Approximately 3–4 weeks for focused quantitative research
Deliverables
Findings, crosstabs, raw data, methodology, reports and media-ready statistics
Research with qualified security and technology leaders, using screening based on role, company profile, responsibilities and decision involvement.
Studies examining breach impact, vulnerability management, security readiness, risk perceptions and evolving threats.
Research into spending priorities, buying criteria, vendor evaluation, implementation barriers and competitive positioning.
Studies planned around RSA Conference, Black Hat and other industry events, with time for research, analysis and content development.
Research examining AI security and governance, shadow AI, data exposure, security-team adoption, trust in AI-powered tools and buyer evaluation of AI security vendors.
CITE Research helps organizations examine how AI is changing security risks, policies, technology evaluation and workforce behavior.
Security professionals, journalists and enterprise buyers are often skeptical of research designed to validate a vendor's product. Credibility requires a relevant audience, neutral questions, transparent methodology and findings that are allowed to challenge the original hypothesis.
CITE Research designs cybersecurity studies with that scrutiny in mind, producing evidence clients can use across strategy, thought leadership, media outreach, conference programs and sales enablement.
Seniority and job title alone may not establish the right audience. Screening can confirm security responsibilities, organizational context and involvement in the decisions being studied.
Questions are designed to investigate the market issue rather than force a predetermined conclusion.
Public-facing studies can include the audience, sample, fieldwork dates, recruitment approach and other information readers need to evaluate the findings.
Data ownership, confidentiality and permitted uses are defined in the engagement agreement. Depending on scope, deliverables may include raw data, crosstabs and methodology documentation.
Zscaler
A global study examining data-risk perceptions, security priorities and enterprise readiness across markets and industries.
View case studyWatchGuard
Research with IT decision-makers and security professionals examining security priorities, vendor evaluation and technology adoption.
Discuss a Similar StudyComputer Services, Inc.
A recurring program examining security and technology priorities within financial institutions.
View case studyParticipants are recruited through appropriate professional research sources and screened using study-specific questions covering role, company characteristics, security responsibilities and decision authority.
Executive and CISO studies may include approximately 100–300 qualified respondents. The appropriate number depends on the audience, intended claims and comparisons required.
Yes. Credible methodology and relevant findings can make research useful to journalists, although editorial coverage cannot be guaranteed.
Yes—when sponsorship is disclosed, questions are neutral and the methodology is transparent. The study should test a hypothesis rather than manufacture a conclusion.
Yes. Research can examine AI usage, data exposure, governance, security-team adoption and buyer trust in AI-powered security products.
Yes, subject to audience and market feasibility. Multi-country studies can use consistent audience definitions with appropriate market-specific recruitment and language adaptation.
Tell us your research objective, audience and intended use. We'll recommend an approach designed for credible findings and practical activation.